debugger

Did Jennifer Aniston's Entourage Get a Hotel Employee Fired?

In Celebs by Kim Muraro , on Monday, October 15, 2012, 7:42 AM (PDT)
hotel worker fired for talking about jen aniston
.

 

Aniston's People Say the Hotel Employee Broke a Confidentiality Policy

A hotel worker in New Mexico claims Jennifer Aniston's "entourage" got him fired after they overheard him saying nice things about the actress … but that's not the whole story.

Terry Siegler, a shuttle driver for the Encantado Resort in Santa Fe, tells TMZ.com he was fired from the resort last week because he told guests that Aniston is "very sweet."

But Siegler made the comments while responding to questions from other resort guests about Aniston, who was staying at the resort while filming the movie We're the Millers. He was shuttling the guests, who had reportedly just seen the actress in the hotel spa.

Read: Whose Engagement Ring Is Better? Jennifer Aniston's or Angelina Jolie's?

The guests asked Siegler if he had seen Aniston, and he said he had, and then told them she is "very sweet and much more petite than I thought."

All positive comments, but what Siegler also did by answering the guests' questions is confirm that the star was also a guest there.

The guests returned to the resort and began gossiping about Aniston staying at the hotel, and when a member of Aniston's entourage overheard it, a complaint was lodged that Siegler was spreading info about the actress.

Siegler was then fired from his $30,000/year job for violating "celebrity policy," TMZ reports.

Siegler's defense: He was just being friendly. "They brought (Aniston) up first … Was I supposed to deny it?"

Interesting point. On the one hand, it seems perfectly reasonable that the shuttle driver was just trying to be friendly and make the guests' stay more enjoyable. And that's a pretty harsh reason to lose your job.

On the other hand, Aniston is a guest, too, and has just as much the right to enjoy her stay, and enjoy her privacy. True, the guests had already identified her, but Siegler did not have to confirm her stay. People think they see someone famous all the time, and it turns out to be a lookalike. He could have said that. Or he could have just told the guests he hadn't seen her.

Read: Jennifer Aniston Launches Hair Care Line With MIT Professor

We're as tired as anyone of celebrities feeling entitled to special treatment, but in this day of celebrity stalkers, and a plethora of very personal and specific information about celebs available on every corner of the Interwebs, it is understandable why famous types might be extra concerned about privacy.

Still, losing his job?

The resort's general manager tells TMZ, "I cannot confirm anything about our employees, but I will say that we have a very strict confidentiality policy and we do enforce those policies."

Siegler is considering filing a wrongful termination suit, meanwhile, and Aniston is, or was, reportedly considering holding her upcoming wedding to actor Justin Theroux in New Mexico.


 
 
«Previous
 
Comments (3)
Posted By Shari (213 days ago)
Perhaps he will win his wrongful termination suit, perhaps not. Perhaps Ms. Aniston should intervine, perhaps not. Whether it was public knowledge that Ms. Aniston was staying at the resort or not, the employees of the resort are bound by a confidentiality agreement (signed when they accept employment). I, too, am employed by a large resort, and we cannot discuss our guests with other guests, employees, etc.; celebrities or otherwise. The correct response for this employee should have been: "I cannot comment on that," Then he could have complimented Ms. Aniston if he wanted, so long as to not construe knowledge of her presence. Again, this goes for any guest, celebrity or not. Even if he did go on to compliment her, he must be careful, because this could be considered gossip; and we are also held to a standard here, as well. Best to smile and change the subject. I also worked for a large bank; they also hold their employees to this type of policy. Imagine if a teller told a wife beater, who is restricted contact, that they saw the woman earlier that day? He could use that knowledge to locate the woman ... While I believe that termination in the case of the NM employee may have been extreme, we do not know all of the circumstances. It could have been his 'last straw'. If it was innocent, and he was caught up in the excitement - why not just a warning? Nuff said.
 
Posted By custom essay writers (35 days ago)
book supplies tactical tips and contains a handbook for creating an action plan for achieving purposeful results.
 
Posted By NikeFree UK Sale (19 days ago)
I have already been visits lots of websites, a lot of them tend to be wonderful nevertheless so far your blog post makes my head blow aside, an individual articles are incredibly intriguing, notable and we can get data to you personally blogs, many thanks for discussing that.
Post A Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Terms of Use. We do not appreciate personal attacks, threats, spam, or the promotion of your personal website.
If you are a member or would like to become a member please login or register.
Or give us your name and email address to comment without becoming a user.
Your name (required):
Email (required):
Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
Enter the characters in this box
Enter the text in the image to the left. (Required)
Comment:
 

More Slide Shows on LimeLife

From our Partners