Friends With Benefits Premiere | Why Being 'Friends with Benefits' Is the Worst Idea, Ever

debugger

Friends With Benefits Premiere

Friends With Benefits Slide 8

Read More About: friends with benefits, mila kunis, justin timberlake, Mila Kunis, Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake, Friends With Benefits, Emma Stone, Olivia Palermo, Shaun White, Justin Timberlake, Olivia Palmero, Justin Timberlake, mila kunis friends with benefits, justin timberlake friends with benefits, onscreen, celebrity news, love and sex, hookups, casual sex

Post A Comment

Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Terms of Use. We do not appreciate personal attacks, threats, spam, or the promotion of your personal website.

If you are a member or would like to become a member please login or register.

Or give us your name and email address to comment without becoming a user.

Your name (required):
Email (required):
	Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
	Enter the text in the image to the left. (Required)

Comment:

‹ prev

next ›

Why Being 'Friends with Benefits' Is the Worst Idea, Ever

Friends with Benefits Neither Friendly Nor Beneficial

Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis might be two of the coolest figures in all of pop culture, but in Friends with Benefits, it grows clear that not even these two could be satisfied as friends who have nothing more tha sex between them. As the film from Sony Pictures releases today, even Dr. Drew has weighed in to explain why casual sex is damaging to individuals. (Thank goodness, someone's finally talking common sense, not common sex.)