debugger

Are Civic-Minded Perfumes Gauche or Good?

In Beauty by Meieli Sawyer Detoni , on Wednesday, January 06, 2010, 11:45 AM (PST)
beauty
What's your opinion?
.

 

Fragrance for Charity a Yea or Nay?

I was recently reading about a perfume, Girlie, which donates half of its proceeds to a school in Kenya, and did a little searching on other fragrances that give back. Interestingly, there seems to be some debate on whether or not a charity-friendly perfumes and cosmetics are in good taste. What do you think?

After catching commentary on posts about past projects like the Scent of Peace by Bond, which donated $2 from each sale in 2006 to UNICEF, I started thinking about what makes charitable perfumes a controversial topic.

My opinion? It all depends on the amount, and how you present it. The Scent of Peace fragrance No. 9 was conceived after September 11th and only pledged to give a measly $2 per bottle, whereas the Girlie scent, out now, is offering a whopping 50% of profits to children. I have a feeling that the recommendations below will be more easily accepted...

Beauty That Give Back

*100% of Lush's Charity Pot hand and body cream profits goes to humanitarian, environmental, or animal welfare-related projects, and they've sold over 18,600 pots of cream to date.

*MAC's collaboration with Fergie benefits the MAC Aids Fund to benefit men, women, and children living with HIV and AIDS. You can check out the lippie here.

*Peacekeeper Cause-Metics is the first cosmetics line to give all of its profits to "Women's Health Advocacy and Human Rights issues."

*Tom's of Maine donates 10% of their pre-tax profits to charitable organizations, some of which support the arts as well as the the environment, education, and human needs. They also urge their employees to donate 5% of their paid time to volunteer activities.

Do you buy cosmetics that donate a certain percentage to charities or give back in the way of community projects?

Read More About beauty »

 
 
«Previous
 
Comments (2)
Posted By Karen T. (2 years ago)
"Profits" can be a slippery and ill-defined term. A guaranteed $2 may be much more than 50% of profits that never materialize. I prefer to give my money directly to those organizations whose work I support. If I choose to buy a product that makes a pledge like those above I consider that as a separate issue. If the other factors are equal then I'll buy the charity-endorsing product.
 
Posted By lush campaigns (2 years ago)
Just to clarify, it's not the profits but all of the sales cost ($20.45), minus mandatory government tax, of Lush's Charity Pot that are donated to good causes. :-)
Post A Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Terms of Use. We do not appreciate personal attacks, threats, spam, or the promotion of your personal website.
If you are a member or would like to become a member please login or register.
Or give us your name and email address to comment without becoming a user.
Your name (required):
Email (required):
Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
Enter the characters in this box
Enter the text in the image to the left. (Required)
Comment:
 

More Slide Shows on LimeLife

Cool Links